data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6be05/6be058243e6bce34e272e6d0eb87ccb2f66a48a3" alt=""
Even though it has overwhelmed our lives at times, I am grateful for the therapies that we've engaged for Martin. ABA has made possible everything from speaking sentences to toileting, from trick-or-treating to playing tag. Speech therapy gave Martin all the structures he needed to talk, converse, and understand. Occupational therapy allowed him to kick a ball, use scissors, and tie his own shoes. Family therapy has provided my husband and I all sorts of guidance for the parenting challenges we have faced. And medicine, well, I am grateful for it. Medicine has provided Martin a little help with impulse control. It has helped us immensely.
I would not be doing this week's duty of teaching readers about autism without mentioning that each of these therapies is also controversial to some degree. Many folks in the neurodiversity movement and autism self-advocacy networks are critical of therapies designed to "overcome" autism. They argue, instead, that society should learn to embrace a variety of ways of being in the world. They ask, for instance, why therapists make kids with autism work on eye contact. Why can't the rest of us just get used to a conversation without it? Some go further and wonder why the push for speech. They encourage folks without autism to consider that there might be ways to communicate without words.
This article from the New York Times, "The Kids Who Beat Autism," speaks to the many therapies that are used with kids with autism. It also explores the ambiguities that parents face. I hope you find it helpful.
No comments:
Post a Comment